MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.

“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”
Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”, This news data comes from:http://www.gyglfs.com
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
- House starts flood control probe
- Makati earns high rating in anti-trafficking and violence assessment
- AFP: It would take more than a tugboat to tow BRP Sierra Madre from Ayungin Shoal
- Bonoan resigns, Dizon named DPWH chief
- Thai court dismisses prime minister over compromising phone call with Cambodian leader
- Judge reverses Trump administration's cuts of billions of dollars to Harvard University
- Escudero says new lease law to make PH more appealing to investors
- Comelec delays implementation of decision disqualifying Duterte Youth Party-List
- US appeals court finds Trump's global tariffs illegal
- Thailand's ex-PM Thaksin acquitted in royal insult case